ISB - A joint venture between HM Treasury and the Cabinet Office. On all pages, clicking on this logo will return you to the Home page.
Title - Invest to Save Budget Image
 Site Help | Contact ISB
You are here: Home > Evaluating an Invest to Save Project Thursday 21st August 2008

Title - Main Topics


Link to About ISB Section About ISB
Evaluation Section Evaluating a Project
Link to ISB Project Managers Section Project Reports/ Evaluations by Policy
Link to ISB Project Managers Section Project Reports/Evaluations by Client
Link to ISB Project Managers Section Useful Documents
Link to ISB Project Managers Section Project Sustainability
Link to ISB Project Managers Section ISB Project Administration
Link to Lesson Learners Section Lesson Learners
Link to Lesson Learners Section Projects

Link to Home Page Home

 

Title - Evaluating an Invest to Save Project

 

This is a very quick guidance note on evaluating an Invest to Save Budget (ISB) project. It is not intended to replace guidance put forward by lead departments or the Treasury's guidance on investment and appraisal (the Green Book).

Point of Interest What is an Evaluation

Point of Interest Useful Documents


Why do I need to complete an evaluation of the project?
The ISB aims to build an evidence base of what has been effective (or not effective) in improving the delivery of public services. This base depends on knowing how projects performed against their objectives.

One way of looking at the ISB portfolio is as a series of 'experiments', each one investigating a new method in public services delivery. Each 'experiment' is not complete until its results have been evaluated. This evaluation is crucial in deciding whether the project should be sustained by other funding streams or adopted more widely.

Who are the intended audience?
ISB projects attract some fairly wide interest, but there are likely to be three main groups:

  • managers in similar organisations, looking to adopt/ modify the project to their area;
  • policy makers and ministers, looking to see if the project should influence the development of policy; and
  • the ISB unit, looking for generic lessons.

Is there a standard format?
There isn't a set format for all ISB projects. Your department may well have a set format that they would like you to follow. Given that a large number of the intended audience will not want to know the full detail of the project, the evaluation should start with an Executive Summary.

What should the evaluation cover?
The evaluation should summarise:

  • Why the outturn differed from that foreseen in the bid;

The evaluation should present the all the evidence of the outturn of the ISB project. Wherever possible, this evidence should be presented in numerical form, e.g. savings, reduction in time, improvement in satisfaction.

  • How effective the activity was in achieving its objectives, and why;
  • Can we be sure that these effects were due to the ISB project?
  • The cost effectiveness of the activity; and
  • Could similar results have been achieved more cheaply?
  • What the results imply for future management or policy decisions.

The evaluation should also point out any other lessons from the project, e.g.

  • 'if we were doing this again we would...',
  • 'we found that it was well worth spending time at the start doing...',
  • 'we struggled with this for a long time but got around the problem by...',
  • 'we think that there could be real benefits from using our methods more widely...'

Who should do it/ How much should it cost?
This depends on the size of the project in question and the nature of the evidence available. The only rule is that someone who is not otherwise involved in the project should complete the evaluation. This is to get an 'independent' view. For small projects with simple objectives, it would not be appropriate to hire outside experts to complete this task. In this case it is perfectly acceptable for someone from one of the partner organisations to complete the evaluation, so long as they were not closely connected with the running of the project.

When should we complete the evaluation?
When you are in a good position to judge what the effect of the project has been. This should not be too long after the project has finished. It may be appropriate to conduct an interim evaluation of a project during its duration if there is sufficient evidence of its effect.

Where can I go for more detailed guidance?
The Treasury's green book guidance for investment appraisal contains a chapter on evaluating projects. This is available at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/greenbook

Top of Page


Point of Interest Useful Documents

This is a short list of issues and questions to provide a framework for looking at project evaluations:

What is an Evaluation

Questions For Evaluations (PDF 106kb)

Evaluating an Invest to Save Project (PDF 86kb)

Please see below examples of evaluations:

Project 154 Tameside Passport to Learning (Word 313kb)

Project 1 Infoshop Final Evaluation (PDF 2.48Mb)

Project 11 Final Evaluation (PDF 73kb)

Project 15 Final Evaluation (PDF 130kb)

Please Note: To download and save any of these documents, right click on the hyperlink and choose the option to 'Save Target As...' from the menu.

Top of Page

 Disclaimer Top of Page